| This article has been printed from the Hullavington Village Website www.hullavington.info. |
The Railway and Hullavington SchoolBy David Hunt In the 1890s, every effort was being made by the Great Western Railway to speed up train services, and to streamline the services further, plans were made and Parliamentary sanction obtained for a general streamlining of the main traffic routes of the Company. One of these routes was the line to South Wales. At that time, despite the completion of the Severn Tunnel, trains still had to pass through Chippenham, Box Tunnel, Bath and the eastern outskirts of Bristol on their way to, or from, Wales. To avoid this particular "Great Way Round", the GWR promoted what was called the South Wales and Bristol Direct Railway. In fact, in building the line, the GWR had more than traffic to South Wales in mind, but had full expectations that Milford, in West Wales, would develop as the port for dealing with extensive overseas traffic. What has all this to do with the Hullavington School? Those of us that live in the village know that the line passes just to the north of Hullavington and it is the quite startling effect that the building of the line had on the school that gave rise to this article. At least as far back as 1860, successive Headmasters of Hullavington have maintained an almost day-to-day diary of events in the school. A number of years ago, I was allowed to read through the diary for the period 1884 to 1903 and, as a railway enthusiast, I immediately turned to the late 1890s to see if any mention was made of the building of the railway. I was pleasantly surprised at how often it was mentioned, but even more surprised at the effect it had on the school. By the end of the nineteenth century, compulsory education was about in its 25th year, and it is thought that the salary of the teachers at Hullavington School was influenced by the attendance at the school. Hence, successive Headmasters, during this period, were very much concerned with attendance figures and much of the diary deals with the daily attendance, often giving reasons why it was either up or down. In May, it would be down because it was the potato-planting season, in September, because it was the potato-picking season, and again in November because beaters were required for the local landowners shoot. During the period from 1897 to 1903, however, there was another factor that influenced the attendance of the school and that was the building of the nearby railway. The first official step towards its construction took place on 29th November 1897 when the Dowager Duchess of Beaufort cut the first sod at the village of Old Sodbury. Nevertheless, preparations were already underway along the length of the line because the headmaster had made his first reference to the railway when his entry was as follows: Week ending 29th October, 1897 During the early 1890s, the number of children on the register at the school had been just over the 100 and, at the start of 1897, stood at 110. This was soon to change! 30th November 1897 10th January 1898 The above is the first mention of the Kingway settlement. This was the temporary settlement built by the navies alongside the new railway close by the point where the A417 Chippenham to Malmesbury road passes under the railway and it was used for the duration of the building of the railway. A site nearly one mile to the north east of Hullavington and a distance which in itself caused the school problems as we shall see later. Still the numbers increased: 17th January, 1898 31st January, 1898 Obviously, as work began seriously to get underway, it became quite an attraction to the villagers of Hullavington because, on the 11th February 1898, the entry read:- "A low attendance this afternoon. Several families are gone to see the Railway Works!" And still more children arrived: 18th April, 1898 29th April, 1898 The school year started in June at that time and the subjects to be studied during the following years 1898-99 reflected the coming of the railway. The object lessons for the infant department included a Railway Station, while on top of the list for the elder scholars were “A steam engine" and "A railway". Although the number was now nearly 160, overcrowding was not always the problem that it might have been because, much to the frustration of the headmaster, large numbers stayed away as indicated by the following entries. 8th July, 1898 22nd July 1898. 1st August, 1898 Bank Holiday By the time of the start of the new term after the Harvest Break in September 1898, the number had reached its maximum of 175, as indicated by the entry for the 12th September when 141 children were present and 34 away. The practice of the railway children being away on a Friday afternoon frustrated the Headmaster. 23rd September 1898 As mentioned earlier, the distance of the settlement from the school did not help attendance figures, especially on wet days as indicated by the following entry: - 23rd November 1898 Not that the problems of the school were going completely unnoticed by the authorities, as is indicated by the Report of the Diocesan Inspector, who visited the school and reported as follows: "This school has received a large addition to its numbers as the result of the adjacent navvy settlement at Kingway, many of these children are ignorant and untrained. Apart from these, this school has reached a level above the average of County Schools". The lack of education of the Kingway children is again emphasized by the entry for: 15th December, 1898:- Still Fridays continued to frustrate the headmaster: Friday, Feb 1899 Sanitary conditions at the Kingway camp were probably extremely poor and illness and perhaps even death were not uncommon, as indicated by the entry as follows: 6th March 1899 Week ending 10th March 1899 As well as poor sanitary conditions, there is no doubt that the educational standards of the children of the navvy families at Kingway were well below the normal levels of the time, as shown by the entry for: 21st March 1899: An amusing entry appears against 17th May, 1899: Still the opportunity for employment by the railway works continued to keep boys away from school: 19th February 1900 Obviously, extremes of weather conditions were experienced during the year 1900 as shown from the following entries: 10th July 1900 26th October 1900 5th December 1900 The frustrations experienced by the Headmaster in trying to maintain good attendance figures are summed up in the following entries: 17th December 1900 5th February l901 18th April 1901 As the first years of the twentieth century passed by, life with the railway children must have settled into a fairly familiar pattern because particular mention of them almost disappears. 26th/27th July 1902 All good things come to an end and as the year 1902 began to close work on the railway began to come to an end as indicated by the following: 30th September 1902 So in due course the line opened and with it the station at Hullavington. It was opened for freight traffic on the 1st January 1903 and to passengers on 1st July 1903 and appears to have required no particular mention by the Headmaster of the time. If there were any celebrations of any kind, they are certainly not mentioned by the head and with the departure of the navvies, school life must have resumed much as it had been five years earlier. Today, the number at the school is much the same at around the 100+ mark, but the school is now on a new site. High Speed Trains race through Hullavington at 125 mph on their way between Paddington and South Wales, but, unfortunately, the Station, along with all the others on the line, was closed both to passengers and freight in the 1960s and little remains. Nevertheless, the embankments, deep cuttings and tunnels remain as a monument to the work of the navvies, some of whom made Hullavington their home for those five years at the turn of the nineteenth/twentieth century. The accompanying photograph is a copy of a photograph that the late Molly Gale of Green’s Close had in her possession. She believed it was a picture taken during the building of the line through Hullavington although I believe I have seen it in a railway book that said it was a picture taken in Devon. Judging by the depth of the cutting it could well be the line through Hullavington but nevertheless indicates the degree of manual labour involved even at the end of the nineteenth century. No man is without his cap! |